New Report finds that the apprenticeship system is failing people from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Workers from disadvantaged backgrounds are being left behind by the apprenticeship system, with numbers slumping by more than a third since the introduction of the apprenticeship levy, says the Social Mobility Commission in its report ‘Apprenticeships and social mobility: Fulfilling potential’ published today (Wednesday 24 June). Most of the benefits are going to more privileged learners. It finds that apprenticeships are one of the most effective means of boosting social mobility for workers from poorer backgrounds – if they can get into the system.
- a 36% decline in apprenticeship by people from disadvantaged backgrounds.
- just 13% of degree-level apprenticeships go to apprentices from disadvantaged backgrounds
- most disadvantaged apprenticeship starters came from three regions: north-west England (25%); the west midlands (15%); and London (15%)
- more than 80% of apprenticeships undertaken by learners from disadvantaged backgrounds are in the services, health, education or public administration sectors
- only 63% of apprenticeships are successfully completed by men from disadvantaged background, compared with 67% from more privileged backgrounds
- on average, apprentices from disadvantaged backgrounds earn less
- there is a 16% boost to wages for learners from disadvantaged backgrounds who complete their training, compared with 10% for others
Analysis shows that the 2017 Apprenticeship Levy reform was followed by a collapse in overall apprenticeship starts and shows that disadvantage gaps opened up at every stage, from employer candidate selection to training quality and pay rates after completion.
Consultant and lead author Alice Battiston said:
There is a severe disadvantage gap throughout the entire apprenticeship training journey, and this has worsened over time. Not only has the proportion of new starters from disadvantaged backgrounds declined over time, but they have also benefited less than their better-off peers from the shift towards higher-level programmes.
Between 2015/16 and 2017/18, there was a 36% decline in disadvantaged apprentice starts in England, compared with a 23% decline for more privileged apprentices. The impact was even greater for older (aged 25+) and female apprentices.
Steven Cooper, interim co-chair of the Social Mobility Commission, commented:
The apprenticeship levy, introduced in 2017, has disproportionately funded higher-level apprenticeships for learners from more advantaged communities, rather than those from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds who would benefit more.
Barriers to success
Disadvantaged apprentices are less likely than their more privileged peers to complete their course. The main reason for dropping out included low levels of pay with small and medium size employers (SMEs) more likely to pay apprentices the minimum wage.
Alice Battiston said:
The relatively low completion rate achieved by disadvantaged apprentices, particularly at intermediate level, is another alarming point emerging from our analysis. Specific interventions are needed to reduce drop-outs.
Apprenticeships boost social mobility
Despite the many barriers faced by disadvantaged learners, the report confirms how effective apprenticeships can be in promoting social mobility.
People from less privileged backgrounds who complete an apprenticeship get a bigger boost in their earnings than other learners. This is particularly true at intermediate level – the first step on the apprenticeship journey. Furthermore, apprentices from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to complete their course on time.
Following the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, however, there are concerns disadvantaged apprentices are at greater risk from an economic decline, with many employed in hard-hit sectors such as hospitality and retail.
Alice Battiston said:
The pandemic is likely to have made the disadvantaged gap worse. There needs to be urgent consideration of the impact of the apprenticeship levy on social mobility outcomes.
Steven Cooper said:
It is no longer credible for the government to assume that apprenticeships automatically improve social mobility and leave the system to its own devices.
Strategic action and direction are needed to target the system better on disadvantaged communities and improve the system’s value for money.
This is an easy win for the government in its attempts at levelling up – if it can get this right. The government must look at the structural barriers in place and take action to channel resources where they will have the greatest effect.
The Social Mobility Commission is an independent advisory non-departmental public body established under the Life Chances Act 2010 as modified by the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016. It has a duty to assess progress in improving social mobility in the UK and to promote social mobility in England.